Improving the word cloud: custom stopwords

Alfonso R. Reyes

2017-11-02

Background

In the previous article we created our first word cloud. A word cloud help us to find quickly the focus of the document by means of the size of the words in the plot.

The problem we saw in the first word cloud is that we were seeing words of common use such as using, use, new, approach and case. These words will distract our attention of the technical orientation of the papers we are researching.

In this session, we will eliminate these common usage words with a customized dictionary or list of words.

Load again the 2918 papers metadata

library(petro.One)
library(tm)
library(tibble)

use_example(1)

p1 <- onepetro_page_to_dataframe("1000_conference.html")
p2 <- onepetro_page_to_dataframe("2000_conference.html")
p3 <- onepetro_page_to_dataframe("3000_conference.html")

nn_papers <- rbind(p1, p2, p3)
nn_papers
## # A tibble: 2,918 x 6
##                                                    title_data
##                                                         <chr>
##  1                                    Neural Networks And AVO
##  2                        Deconvolution Using Neural Networks
##  3                   Neural Network Stacking Velocity Picking
##  4           Hydrocarbon Prediction Using Dual Neural Network
##  5      Higher-Order Neural Networks in Petroleum Engineering
##  6  Multiple Attenuation With Attribute-based Neural Networks
##  7   Conductive fracture identification using neural networks
##  8           APPLYING NEURAL NETWORK IN HYDROTREATING PROCESS
##  9                 Bit Bounce Detection Using Neural Networks
## 10 Artificial Neural Networks in Drilling Troubles Prediction
## # ... with 2,908 more rows, and 5 more variables: paper_id <chr>,
## #   source <chr>, type <chr>, year <int>, author1_data <chr>

Convert and clean document for text mining

Note that here we are removing some elemental common words, the ones supplied by the a text mining package called tm. This is the same function we used in the previous session. It does not eliminate words like using, use, etc.

vdocs <- VCorpus(VectorSource(nn_papers$title_data))
vdocs <- tm_map(vdocs, content_transformer(tolower))      # to lowercase
vdocs <- tm_map(vdocs, removeWords, stopwords("english")) # remove stopwords

Create own custom stopwords

We can take a look at what words to stop if we see the dataframe tdm.df in the previous article. Here are some:

# our custom vector of stop words

my_custom_stopwords <- c("approach", 
                      "case", 
                      "low",
                      "new",
                      "north",
                      "real",
                      "use", 
                      "using"
                      )

Remove custom stopwords from the document corpus

# this is one way to remove custom stopwords
vdocs <- tm_map(vdocs, removeWords, my_custom_stopwords)

Summary table with words frequency

tdm <- TermDocumentMatrix(vdocs)

tdm.matrix <- as.matrix(tdm)
tdm.rs <- sort(rowSums(tdm.matrix), decreasing=TRUE)
tdm.df <- data.frame(word = names(tdm.rs), freq = tdm.rs, stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
as.tibble(tdm.df)                          # prevent long printing of dataframe
## # A tibble: 5,133 x 2
##          word  freq
##  *      <chr> <dbl>
##  1     neural   520
##  2  reservoir   499
##  3       data   348
##  4    seismic   291
##  5    network   288
##  6 artificial   283
##  7   analysis   249
##  8 prediction   245
##  9   networks   227
## 10      field   218
## # ... with 5,123 more rows

You see now that using is not at the top of the table as it was before. Let’s plot the wordcloud.

Word cloud with words that occur at least 50 times

library(wordcloud)

set.seed(1234)
wordcloud(words = tdm.df$word, freq = tdm.df$freq, min.freq = 50,
          max.words=200, random.order=FALSE, rot.per=0.35,
          colors=brewer.pal(8, "Dark2"))

Now the wordcloud looks more technical oriented. Words of common use have been removed. That bring us more clarity.

What’s next

There are a couple of things that we will notice in this phase of the text mining: (1) words that have similar root (log, logs, network, networks, system vs systems, etc.); and (2) words that are similar but are separated differently by dashes (real time vs. real-time, 3D vs 3-D, etc.); and (3) words that are similar but have puctuation signs such as commas, dots, exclamation sign, etc. (-time, field,).

We will work on them inn the next articles.